Revisiting Coverage of the Dossier | National Review

Revisiting Coverage of the Dossier | National Review


Former president Donald Trump speaks during a rally at the Iowa States Fairgrounds in Des Moines, Iowa, October 9, 2021. (Rachel Mummey/Reuters)

I’ve complained about the lack of accountability over the media’s credulous and hysterical coverage of the Russian dossier.

The Washington Post corrections are a sign that even the mainstream press is beginning to realize how bad it was.

There’s also this item from Axios today titled “1 big thing: The media’s epic fail”:

A reckoning is hitting news organizations for years-old coverage of the 2017 Steele dossier, after the document’s primary source was charged with lying to the FBI, Axios Media Trends reporter Sara Fischer writes.

  • Why it matters: It’s one of the most egregious errors in modern journalistic history, and the media’s response to its own mistakes has so far been tepid.

Outsized coverage of the unvetted document drove a media frenzy at the start of Donald Trump’s presidency, helping drive a narrative of collusion between former President Trump and Russia.

The Axios item, by the way, reminds me of the Erik Wemple series on how the media botched the dossier.





Original source

#Revisiting #Coverage #Dossier #National #Review

About the Author

Tony Beasley
Tony Beasley writes for the Local News, US and the World Section of ANH.